
Via Metafilter, I found an interesting pair of articles, one claiming that vinyl is dead, the other claiming that it ain’t going anywhere.
As someone with 4,000 records that I’ve dragged from apartment to apartment, and for which I eventually had to make a giant hutch in my den (okay, it holds my TV, too, but I just can’t bring myself to admit that I own a custom-made “entertainment unit”), I’m interested in the whole debate from an emotional standpoint, since, as even the guy who argues in support of vinyl admits that it’s, er, a little impractical in the iPod era.
Where he ends up, I think, is spot-on. Vinyl has what you might call a presence. If I were a pretentious ass, I might point you to Walter Benjamin’s seminal piece, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”. But you know, Bloggerton is way too street for that bookish nonsense. I’m keepin’ it real.
The reason I might have thought of Benjamin (but only if I were a pretentious ass, mind you) is that he suggests that paintings, as opposed to photos, had an aura. (Ironically, of course, that’s shifted a bit, because in the Flickr era, photos have an aura. The difference between holding an old photo of your dad, on the one hand, and zapping the same photo up to Flickr is a pretty big one, I think.)
Vinyl has an aura. MP3s, not so much.
For myself, there’s naturally a place for both. That’s why I hope vinyl won’t die, even though I can’t remember the last time I actually bought one.
Anyway, I’ll shut it. How did this post end up being all crazy philisophical? Check out the articles. It’s a fun little debate.
Read on