<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where do they get that figure from?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/</link>
	<description>Dropping more plop than a pigeon.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Thanks Finn.  It's a weird and messy world this photographer thing.  I wish as a film / tv editor I had the same rights over the content I assemble.  If only he would have sold me the photograph . . . but this jackass wanted profit share of the company I was building the website for!?  He was actually convinced that his photo would increase sales.  The photograph was a macro-shot of a vintage laundromat dial . . . I can definitely see the the correlation . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Finn.  It&#8217;s a weird and messy world this photographer thing.  I wish as a film / tv editor I had the same rights over the content I assemble.  If only he would have sold me the photograph . . . but this jackass wanted profit share of the company I was building the website for!?  He was actually convinced that his photo would increase sales.  The photograph was a macro-shot of a vintage laundromat dial . . . I can definitely see the the correlation . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editor</title>
		<link>http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Finn,

a) the bobbies have been at my house and it was quite confusing
b) I want my camera back
c) I'd like that picture, please. Two 8x10s and a few wallet size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finn,</p>
<p>a) the bobbies have been at my house and it was quite confusing<br />
b) I want my camera back<br />
c) I&#8217;d like that picture, please. Two 8&#215;10s and a few wallet size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finn</title>
		<link>http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Finn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Everyone with a camera is a photographer now, just like everyone with Photoshop is a Designer.
To answer your question, the photographer ownes the image, and the client buys the rights to use that image through a usage fee (the media, timeline, and actual usage to be agreed upon by both parties through contracts and model/landscape releases), and once that usage time is up, it is then available to be used/sold freely by the photographer (governed by the releases).
Mark: how could the camera's owner own the image? I take a picture of the Queen's titties with your camera, and the Bobbies come knocking at your door, are you going to jail?
This friend/photographer sounds like a case. Geez, it's not as if his name was going to be blazed across the images! Shoot it, bill it, and move on...right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone with a camera is a photographer now, just like everyone with Photoshop is a Designer.<br />
To answer your question, the photographer ownes the image, and the client buys the rights to use that image through a usage fee (the media, timeline, and actual usage to be agreed upon by both parties through contracts and model/landscape releases), and once that usage time is up, it is then available to be used/sold freely by the photographer (governed by the releases).<br />
Mark: how could the camera&#8217;s owner own the image? I take a picture of the Queen&#8217;s titties with your camera, and the Bobbies come knocking at your door, are you going to jail?<br />
This friend/photographer sounds like a case. Geez, it&#8217;s not as if his name was going to be blazed across the images! Shoot it, bill it, and move on&#8230;right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editor</title>
		<link>http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-700</guid>
		<description>If only it had been a picture of Paris Hilton's naughty bits, your photo would be on PerezHilton today!

Finn, if you're reading this, what's the answer to Mark's question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only it had been a picture of Paris Hilton&#8217;s naughty bits, your photo would be on PerezHilton today!</p>
<p>Finn, if you&#8217;re reading this, what&#8217;s the answer to Mark&#8217;s question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rozeluk</title>
		<link>http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rozeluk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggerton.ca/2006/12/18/where-do-they-get-that-figure-from/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I had a recent bout with an ex-photographer-friend-of-mine who I commissioned to take photos for a website I had done.  I was an integral part of the shoot (often pulling the shutter release) art directing all the shots.  This fellow later tried to sue me because I wasn't using the photo as it was intended.  Sadly, he does have rights to say this (despite the fact that I paid for the film).  Though for me the real question was: who does the photo belong to?  The guy who pushed the button?  Set the aperture?  Framed the shot?  Owns the camera?  

In an effort to avoid further argument, I offered to purchase said photograph (as my client loved the shot and really wanted to use it).  This clown's retort was: "The photograph is not for sale.  I don't want it used in your site design".  

I grabbed my shitty digital point and shoot, returned to the location and retook the photograph.  I then opened photoshop and matched the color and depth of field of the original.  Long story short - client didnt know the difference and this guy just looked like a jackass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I had a recent bout with an ex-photographer-friend-of-mine who I commissioned to take photos for a website I had done.  I was an integral part of the shoot (often pulling the shutter release) art directing all the shots.  This fellow later tried to sue me because I wasn&#8217;t using the photo as it was intended.  Sadly, he does have rights to say this (despite the fact that I paid for the film).  Though for me the real question was: who does the photo belong to?  The guy who pushed the button?  Set the aperture?  Framed the shot?  Owns the camera?  </p>
<p>In an effort to avoid further argument, I offered to purchase said photograph (as my client loved the shot and really wanted to use it).  This clown&#8217;s retort was: &#8220;The photograph is not for sale.  I don&#8217;t want it used in your site design&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I grabbed my shitty digital point and shoot, returned to the location and retook the photograph.  I then opened photoshop and matched the color and depth of field of the original.  Long story short - client didnt know the difference and this guy just looked like a jackass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

